🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of states are considering similar bans.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to pass a bill increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a useful first step," commented one parliamentarian supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Last year, support built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing harmful online content suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the regional government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to one hour of social media use per day, with any further time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to follow the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, additional countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide debate evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.